| ATTN | |
|
+13nolahornets394 Joylesstuna EvilTACO941 ChrisPBaken Cass277 R3N3GAD3 LEX HARDCORE I alick I Dacheat TheTerminator chevro1et A Can Of Win Jess Un Ojo 17 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
chevro1et
Posts : 537 Join date : 2010-04-18 Age : 49 Location : Busan, South Korea (GMT +9)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:10 am | |
| Does Jack's beastly Crimson Lance go up against this: OR this: Even though Jack's Lance has a ridiculous RoF, it technically isn't a Liquid. This is the same issue we had with the Penetrators, Desert vs. Liquid. In that case, we went with "RoF" and "Damage" categories, but these Hyperions may be viewed a little differently, due to the fact that they don't have a full-auto mechanism. And on another note, this change was made in the OP with no discussion, just switched: Now in OP: Originally in OP: Personally, I think a barrel4 vs barrel5 discussion is warranted and likely worthwhile. | |
|
| |
EvilTACO941
Posts : 603 Join date : 2010-04-18
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:24 am | |
| The reason that the red one is staying is that jess is doing 2 with crimson material and 2 with red material.
Then everyone voice your opinions on those two ogres which should go up in the OP? | |
|
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:27 am | |
|
@ Taco we need to work out some system where i know what you have updated and not.
@ the Penetrator issue i have made the adjustment dose it please the court?
| |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:35 am | |
| On the Ogres, the element does not matter - it should simply be a representation of a barrel4 version and a barrel5 version.
I am working on getting the unique boss weapons filled in, but the Lady Finger, Sentinel and Nailer are driving me nuts.
Last edited by Cass277 on Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:40 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
EvilTACO941
Posts : 603 Join date : 2010-04-18
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:39 am | |
| Jess I updated everrything but
Didn't know where to put chev's double protector added rockets and updated all others on last page | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:42 am | |
| My point of view on the Lances: Lances are about accuracy, not fire rate. 2 categories are warrented here; crimson = damage, liquid = fire rate. Jacks just has the mix of those parts again., just like the penetrator for Renegade. I think it deserves the spot for the fire rate for now My point of view on the ogres: the same as for the revolutions, accuracy isn't relevant on support machine guns, only on cobra's etc. I'll take the extra damage coupled with the bigger clip any day | |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:47 am | |
| Terminator has a 3.6 fire rate lance with 893 dmg, we'll see if he can provide a good picture of that later.
@ alick: Some poeple prefer the barrel 5 versions, like me. Accuracy is of course important on MGs, just like SMGs.
Last edited by Cass277 on Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:48 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
chevro1et
Posts : 537 Join date : 2010-04-18 Age : 49 Location : Busan, South Korea (GMT +9)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:48 am | |
| I'm fine with the way the Penetrator debate was solved. I already voiced my approval of that. The Penetrator is a unique weapon and was dealt with as such.
As far as the Hyperions are concerned, I was simply asking which one Jack's Lance would go up against, as this is a different situation that that relating to the Penetrators.
And regarding the Ogres (and IMO any weapon 'upgrade' that is not a single attribute upgrade, ie, involving a combination of dam/ acc/ RoF changes) I think that discussion is required.
And Jess' comment (that was edited out) regarding no more than 2 submissions/ upgrades per day, sorry bro, just trying to fill empty slots. Will keep it in check from now on.
Please don't take any comments as argumentative, bitching, moaning, whining, or inflammatory. i am simply trying to be critical in the analysis and ensure that the 'Best' are represented in the OP. That's what we all want, right?
| |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:49 am | |
| He edited that out? Hmm... I thought taco did a great job at adding all my filler rockets | |
|
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:49 am | |
| VOTE MY HELLFIRE SELF FOUND VS THE OP THAT WAS SUBMITTED BY JACK | |
|
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:53 am | |
| - Quote :
- And Jess' comment (that was edited out) regarding no more than 2
submissions/ upgrades per day, sorry bro, just trying to fill empty slots. Will keep it in check from now on. - Quote :
- He edited that out? Hmm... I thought taco did a great job at adding all my filler rockets
Yes i can edit my posts as i please. I just read it and reailzed that everyone was sorta following that rule just seems like alot cause Chev and Jack posted 2 Upgrades and the rest were fillers. From now on please post them in different reply's 1 for upgrades and 1 for fillers ALSO please no more than 2 Upgrades and 2 Fillers from now on. Thanks
- Quote :
- My
point of view on the Lances: Lances are about accuracy, not fire rate. 2 categories are warrented here; crimson = damage, liquid = fire rate. Jacks just has the mix of those parts again., just like the penetrator for Renegade. I think it deserves the spot for the fire rate for now
My point of view on the ogres: the same as for the revolutions, accuracy isn't relevant on support machine guns, only on cobra's etc. I'll take the extra damage coupled with the bigger clip any day
I couldnt have said it better. I think in the case of Cobras and Pearl Havocs i preffer acc barrel but in others i prefer damage....IMO Yall decide. - Quote :
- Please don't take any comments as argumentative, bitching, moaning,
whining, or inflammatory. i am simply trying to be critical in the analysis and ensure that the 'Best' are represented in the OP. That's what we all want, right? Its ok that your an asshole. JK JK JK
Last edited by Jess Un Ojo on Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:59 am; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:53 am | |
| @ chevy: would never take it like that since argument/opinion is encouraged ... but the vote was called and ... hmm but I kinda voted for mine ... @ taco 1: missed the update for my revolution unless I missed something @ taco 2: the names on the OP for the surkovs are switched between the 2 | |
|
| |
Gun Jack
Posts : 171 Join date : 2010-04-18 Age : 42 Location : G County, Ohio
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:55 am | |
| That was submitted by Chev. but that is not relevant. Yours should go up Jess. My vote. EDIT: Even with the VHEEC versus HEEC the dmg. from the Tech Pool is high enough along with the increased dmg. to think Jess's should go up. On subject of the Lances: - I alick I wrote:
- My point of view on the Lances: Lances are about accuracy, not fire rate. 2 categories are warrented here; crimson = damage, liquid = fire rate. Jacks just has the mix of those parts again., just like the penetrator for Renegade. I think it deserves the spot for the fire rate for now
I agree.
Last edited by Gun Jack on Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:06 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| |
| |
chevro1et
Posts : 537 Join date : 2010-04-18 Age : 49 Location : Busan, South Korea (GMT +9)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:57 am | |
| - I alick I wrote:
- My point of view on the ogres: the same as for the revolutions, accuracy isn't relevant on support machine guns, only on cobra's etc. I'll take the extra damage coupled with the bigger clip any day
I agree with the decision made with the Revolutions where the difference was: Accuracy decrease -> 8.8 Damage increase -> 33 But, in the case of the Ogres: Accuracy decrease -> 6.8 Damage increase: -> 9 Thats damn near a 1-for-1 trade-off in acc for damage, not really too sure how I feel about that. Is clip size going to play a factor? If so, then are scopes and stocks also going to be mitigating factors in future decisions? EDIT: If there was a vote on the Ogres, then I missed it and am shit outta luck. Jess' Hellfire is WIN.
Last edited by chevro1et on Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:02 am; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| |
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:02 am | |
| The OP is just High Elemental Effect. Mine is VHEEC | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:04 am | |
| - Jess Un Ojo wrote:
- The OP is just High Elemental Effect. Mine is VHEEC
Oops sorry typo corrected, I meant yours Jess. | |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:05 am | |
| Well, the max barrel 4 will hit 370, while a max barrel 5 would hit 342, but I would still use the barrel 5 version -accuracy on MGs IS preferencial. I still say it would be easier just to create a barrel4 and barrel 5 category for the Ogres/Revolutions.
And I thought VHEEC didn't even matter on Hellfires because they have an unlimited tech pool? It won't proc higher than a x4, and Hellfires are ALWAYS x4. Also, they proc every shot so it's kinda redundant. | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:08 am | |
| - Cass277 wrote:
- @ alick: Some poeple prefer the barrel 5 versions, like me. Accuracy is of course important on MGs, just like SMGs.
Its not really about preference; machine guns and smgs are not suppossed to be used as pinpoint accuracy guns ... we all do however because the game allows it. To me they are about bigger clips = more bullets to "spray" | |
|
| |
I alick I
Posts : 622 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 50 Location : Merksem, Belgium, Europe (GMT+1)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:09 am | |
| - Cass277 wrote:
- Well, the max barrel 4 will hit 370, while a max barrel 5 would hit 342, but I would still use the barrel 5 version -accuracy on MGs IS preferencial. I still say it would be easier just to create a barrel4 and barrel 5 category for the Ogres/Revolutions.
And I thought VHEEC didn't even matter on Hellfires because they have an unlimited tech pool? It won't proc higher than a x4, and Hellfires are ALWAYS x4. Also, they proc every shot so it's kinda redundant. The procs are "bigger" and will splash more on VHEEC's ... I believe. | |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:11 am | |
| Doesn't matter, cause I would take a 95 acc Hyperion Stinger over a Torgue one for example.. you get to land all your bullets in one place and do more damage than you would if they were to miss. | |
|
| |
chevro1et
Posts : 537 Join date : 2010-04-18 Age : 49 Location : Busan, South Korea (GMT +9)
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:12 am | |
| Regardless of the VHEEC vs HEEC, Jess' is win. Fully support a acc decrease 3 for damage increase 32. | |
|
| |
Jess Un Ojo
Posts : 704 Join date : 2010-04-19 Age : 39 Location : Beaumont, Tx
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:16 am | |
| Ok so what guns should we have the barrel 4 barrel 5 versions? | |
|
| |
Cass277
Posts : 310 Join date : 2010-04-21
| Subject: Re: ATTN Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:17 am | |
| On MGs, if we made a category for both this whole thing would be over Like what happened with the Penetrators. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: ATTN | |
| |
|
| |
| ATTN | |
|